<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marketing blogger&#8217;s reaction to my question to Wal-Mart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialmediaguy.com/2007/09/marketing-bloggers-reaction-to-my-question-to-wal-mart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialmediaguy.com/2007/09/marketing-bloggers-reaction-to-my-question-to-wal-mart/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 10:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cass</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaguy.com/2007/09/marketing-bloggers-reaction-to-my-question-to-wal-mart/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediaguy.com/2007/09/21/marketing-bloggers-reaction-to-my-question-to-wal-mart/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your interest, I thought you had the right idea, and were about the only person who asked a touch question of Steve. I still think your preliminary statement muddled the eventual question&#039;s delivery. And by not addressing it to the whole panel and just Josh and Dan you put them in an awkward position. They would have of had to have given tacit agreement with everything you said. Which they might well have done so but the three were all on the same panel together so out of politeness they declined to answer your question. Which meant that Steve did not even really have to answer the question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your interest, I thought you had the right idea, and were about the only person who asked a touch question of Steve. I still think your preliminary statement muddled the eventual question&#8217;s delivery. And by not addressing it to the whole panel and just Josh and Dan you put them in an awkward position. They would have of had to have given tacit agreement with everything you said. Which they might well have done so but the three were all on the same panel together so out of politeness they declined to answer your question. Which meant that Steve did not even really have to answer the question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
